a short story by
Josefina
September 2010
[Foreword by the Author:
Dear readers: the author of this short story recognizes it as her duty to inform you that she is in no way affiliated with the new infectious movement of the so-called “second sex”; a representative of which is portrayed artistically below. The author alienates herself from females considering themselves “having the luxury not to marry”; ultimately they will achieve nothing save a grotesque illustration to the consequences of last century’s emancipation of our sex. These “elitist” women are intended on refraining from lending their healthy vessels to natural procreation, and yet they search for any pretext so as to devour masculine energy, thus keeping fine examples of the opposite sex from breeding freely in stable relationships with simple women – confirmed as being normal and necessary by the institution of matrimony – luring men, capturing men only to later leave them broken, lonely, contaminated as these women move onto the next adventure. They are the true malady of our modern society. They have sneaked up on us, slipped into our institutions of higher education only to taint our children with their immoral teachings and infect our science with their radical manners. The author is alarmed to hear two of them conducting a course called “Introduction to Inconvenience for Women” in the Institute of Gender Studies at Charles University in Prague. The author has even been reached by the disquieting rumor that these two female professors often attend conferences in different parts of the world not to further their academic interests, but to see if they both can seduce two men belonging to the same ethnic group (according to the rumor the most recent men were both Jewish, resulting in these women later on reading “Parts of Speech” out loud to each other before going to bed so as to stimulate dreams involving Joseph Brodsky; the author thinks it hardly necessary for her to say that this is an outrageously indecent behavior toward a highly esteemed Nobel Prize winner). Reunited in Czech Republic afterwards, they will compare experiences and draw conclusions later embedded into their scholarly research (the best-selling study “Yekaterinburg-Tashkent” being an exceptional instance of such scholastic psychosis – our time’s veiled illness). These women may be enjoying themselves at present, being as now coincides with the height of their blossoming youth, but eventually they will wake up to find themselves old, alone, and destitute; vulnerable victims of that “room of one’s own”.
The author can prove she does not belong to their sick kind: she married her high school sweetheart at the age of eighteen after he impregnated her at seventeen. Subsequently they have been blessed with two more children and are happy together and living in a house in the suburb of a smaller town. She only admits to having one thing in common with the fickle female, the hazy heroine of her short story: taking pleasure in the same type of men. The author’s husband may be without a high school diploma but he is almost 2 meters tall.]
*
She remembers snow.
It was late on a February evening and early in her adult life. Her feet were freezing as she was standing; taking a walk around at times, trying to get warm, to keep warm, while waiting for the bus and expecting an answer to the text she just sent him. Even after getting on the yellow marshrutka she doesn’t take off her hat – as well as letting the knitted scarf remain covering her lips, cheeks, nose – it was still cold and green, red neon signs were passing by on the frosted window’s other side. He doesn’t leave her waiting (he never will, but this she had yet to find out): “Sweet dreams to you too. But I never have any dreams after getting high…” She looks out the rear window. Electric lights around were becoming scarce. She looks down and then follows the broken asphalt beneath with her eyes as the little bus travels out of a Siberian city, heading further into suburban darkness…
If you were to tell her – many, many years later, of course – that this was her youth, she wouldn’t agree. Many, many years later the man behind the text message will say he was already in love with her then. That earlier on that same evening when she stood alone watching pale snowflakes dancing around a grey high-rise building in a suburb without a name, that only hours prior to this he had fallen for her. And as the wind grew stronger, it takes a hold of her scarf, unraveling it from around her neck; to also dance in a white flurry against the black night all around her. And she doesn’t know that every man she meets from now on can and will be used against her – by him…
She remembers the horse.
If you were to ask her – though she might not explain why – she would say this horse was her youth. It was a warm day with clear-blue skies in May when together they found a horse living in one of the rooms of an abandoned hotel, in a ruin of concrete and steel on an empty shore of a Greek island. Citizens of one country, inhabitants of different cities, they met in Greece. He was tall, built like an athlete and had skin marked by many days spent under the sun. She was small, light like a dancer and had colors reminding of honey in vanilla yogurt. One morning he asked her to come walking with him. The season was still early; tourists were scarce. The streets around were empty, the air hot and everywhere an intense scent of thyme prevailed. He asked her age; their whole week together she wouldn’t say.
She was fifteen.
Eventually she told him she was fourteen.
Either way, he was much older.
She remembers how they’re walking past small white-wash houses – for hours she tells him stories from a lived she hasn’t lived yet – passing by tiny fruit trees from which he picks an orange and gives it to her. She starts peeling it after they sit down on the white sand on a secluded beach. His right hand searches underneath her tank-top, the left one is tracing the skin beneath the cross around her neck – all the while she’s peeling the orange, feeding him one piece with every piece she places in her own mouth. He likes to listen. She will grow accustomed to talking. Together they enter the abandoned hotel. She runs ahead of him down the bare corridor and he follows her – his legs are much longer, he is naturally faster, he doesn’t have to run to catch her – then he grabbed her by the waist, lifted her up, pressed her back against the wall, held her firmly as he kissed her. She laughs. He lets go and allows for her to lead him further in, deeper into the echoing building…
The horse was standing in the middle of what should’ve been a bedroom. It was tied up against what should have been part of the balcony. The cement ground which should’ve had wooden floors and maybe even a carpet was covered with hay and water’s dripping from the roof, pouring down along one wall, gathering in the bathtub. The horse is white and she approached it holding out her sugary sweet hands – from the orange she just peeled – for it to lick. The horse is kind – despite having a coarse tongue – and she pets it, patting along its mane, softly touching its nose with her lips. He walks up from behind, lifting her up, placing her on the horse. Then he led them through the corridor, out of the ruin, down to the ocean. He walks beside the horse as she rides along the water. And when the sun set the horse made its way back home quietly and on its own, leaving the two of them alone on the beach; her head on his chest, his left hand underneath her cotton panties…
Not a thing she told this man was true. Except when confessing to still being a child. And all he ever said was: “You looked like a queen riding on that horse – your golden locks glittering in the sun just like a crown…”
This was the first time she slept underneath the stars.
Several years later – and the fifteen year old she once was who swam naked in the Mediterranean Sea with a grown man (beard and everything), would’ve have thought herself impossibly old by now – she will learn to stop telling stories from the life she has already lived. It is one thing to tell of people never seen, scenes not lived, places not been and quite something else to share the truth.
She remembers snow. She remembers the horse. And one day she will also remember now.
15 reactions:
Nice story! The horse, the sea and the abandoned hotel are very powerful symbols and you create a very intense atmosphere.
I dislike the foreword, though. I find it unrelated to the least.
Ok. I feel like I should defend the genius from the philistines. This is the best-matching foreword for this wonderful story!!!
And these two behave outrageously. For sure. How come some women can be so inconvinient?!
At least the greek island and the abandoned hotel is true,I was there too.
But even though the man was older he had no beard, and the horse might just have happened,you´ll never know with greeks and how they pick their stables.
But that is artistic freedom for you. If you want a horse in a hotel and a man with a beard, you´ll get it!
Very convenient indeed! :)
Katya, "de gustibus non est disputandum", but I don't see anything outrageous in a story on a girl discovering sex and life.
It's actually beautiful. I think the story is honest, the foreword isn't. Hence my feeling of mismatch between both.
Maybe we are looking at it from different conventions.
I do love your blog, and I quite liked one of the short stories on your web site, as I mentioned in my email to you (did you get my email?). I think you have the potential to be an excellent writer. Your language skills are obviously exceptional, in that you can write well in at least three languages. But I feel I would be doing a disservice to you not to give you my honest opinions.
At this point in my life (I'm 52), I'm primarily a non-fiction guy, but I have read my share of fiction too. I realize that you may be a bit on the other side of the cognitive-affective sprectrum from me, but could we see a bit more of your cognitive side on the blog? You've cracked on men (with good reason) for judging women based on appearances only, but yet your web site is festooned with glamour-shot photos of you. You're pursuing a doctorate in Russian literature. How about posting some of your academic writing or thoughts on your blog, at least occasionally?
As to your short story "Enfant Fatale / Femme Terrible," here goes my chance of ever being elected the president of your fan club ...
The only living, breathing character is the horse! The men and the girl-woman are opaque blanks. Poseable mannequins. Like one finds in middle-to-late Bresson films. You, the author, even have to position their hands for them – "His right hand searches underneath her tank-top, the left one is tracing the skin beneath the cross around her neck," and so on – in order to simulate amorous intent. Perhaps, as in Bresson's Au Hasard Balthazar, this is intentional. Perhaps we are meant to identify with the animal character rather than the people. But this reading seems questionable. The horse too is but a prop. He even takes himself home, supposedly. I found myself, in reading the story, more concerned about the horse's fate – did it make it back to its place okay, who is tending him, who is caring for him? – than the fate of the girl, or the woman reflecting back on herself at some later time, or whatever we're supposed to see her as. You allow me to feel nothing towards her. Is this your intent? Can the foreward be taken at face value, and does it thereby signal that this is, in fact, your intent? Is the whole thing meant as a self-canceling rant, where the foreword and the main body of the story keep infolding upon themselves, origami-like, until they disappear with a plopping sound? Leaving the reader to think and feel, what?
So, I agree with Pablo in disliking the foreword, but I disagree with his comment that "you create a very intense atmosphere." You do create an atmosphere, but nothing about it is intense, in my opinion. The story is actually predictable and flaccid. There is no sense of self-propulsion here. And the reason for this is that the story has no bones. A story must have flesh and blood and bones. Without all three, it cannot even walk, much less run. The story has nice flesh, very little blood, and no bones. No, I take that back. It has exactly one bone (which by itself is useless, does not a skeleton make), which is the following line: "And she doesn’t know that every man she meets from now on can and will be used against her – by him ..." This line has propulsion, this line pricks the reader's ears and makes the reader wonder, "What's going to happen next?" But like an orphan with no prospects, the line had no buildup and it led nowhere. It seems to belong in another story that wasn't written. I would rather have read the story that wasn't written.
Pablo, I was referring to the foreword.
At this point in my life (I'm 52), I'm primarily a non-fiction guy, but I have read my share of fiction too. I realize that you may be a bit on the other side of the cognitive-affective sprectrum from me, but could we see a bit more of your cognitive side on the blog? You've cracked on men (with good reason) for judging women based on appearances only, but yet your web site is festooned with glamour-shot photos of you. You're pursuing a doctorate in Russian literature. How about posting some of your academic writing or thoughts on your blog, at least occasionally?
Michael, I know we come from two completely separate generations, but I see no dilemma in my lovely sister-in-law posting "glamour shots". Her intelligence shines through in every post she writes, and honestly, she's gorgeous ALL_THE_TIME and couldn't be ugly in a photo or IRL even if she tried. I hate that women should have to choose between being intelligent and beautiful, if you have both - FLAUNT it and change perceptions of how things "should be" along the way. Why succumb to the stereotype of the mousy-haired academic with out-of-date glasses when that's not who you are? Womean and men are complex creatures, don't let your preset conceptions of how and what Josefina should be posting to be setting the "right" impression dictate how you percieve her.
This is her life, how she chooses to share it no ones business but her own, and I think she does it fabulously. No wonder she "cracks on men" when it's behaviour like yours that shame women for being proud of who/what/how they are. JUST as they are. Expectations be damned.
I'm sorry for ranting. Might come off a bit hopscotchy.
Elin,
I think you are taking one sentence I wrote and spinning it out of proportion. You're free to do that. Just as Josefina is free to do whatever she wants. Note the last three words of this other sentence I wrote:
"How about posting some of your academic writing or thoughts on your blog, at least occasionally?"
As a reader of J's blog, I enjoy her free associative writing here, and her glamour shots on her web site are fine too. But at least occasionally it would also be nice to read, for example, what she hopes to accomplish in her research. I myself am keenly interested in the intersection of Russian literature and Russian religious philosophy, which if you visit my blog site, is readily apparent. I would be curious to know what J thinks about this topic, but my sense from one post of hers I read, way back in the slipstream, is that she avoids the Russian religious philosophers like the plague. I could be wrong about that, of course.
It may be that J uses this blog as a release from her serious, scholarly side. What's that old joke about bus drivers, when they go on vacation? The last thing they want to do on vacation is ride in a bus. Similarly, perhaps, the last thing J wants to do here is write about her research. And that's fair enough. It's her blog, of course.
But I'm free to write my honest opinions too (so long as J allows public commenting). Live and let live!
Michael, I think I went off all rantish, because you made it seem like she should be posting academical work in order to make up for the glamour shots. Balance out her vanity or something. Which would be totally unneccessary.
And yes, free speech and public commenting is a wonderful thing, but I, had I been J, would not find myself motivated to post my academic word after having it requested in a manner such as yours.
Elin,
The sentence of mine that you so object to was a response to the incongruity between this statement by J, not two weeks ago:
"I always knew that what men actually want is to have sexual intercourse. Now this doesn’t apply to all men. Unfortunately, the number is constantly growing. Come on! Can’t you tell a girl you like her for something else than her appearance? I’ve written freakin’ novels, you should know I can hold a conversation. And I know some good anecdotes, too. Get my drift?"
and the half-dozen or so glamour-shot photos that are front and center on her web site.
As for me "not asking nicely enough," that may be so, and for that I apologize to her.
I told her that her story (only this story - I quite praised a different story of hers, in a private email) wasn't any good. Nevertheless, I did tell that I thought she had the potential to be an excellent writer. If J has any hope of reaching that goal, however, it won't be by listening to friends and relatives, who tell her that everything she writes is wonderful.
Writers must have thick skins. They must be able to accept criticism. One post of J's (I can't remember how far back) almost made it seem like she had given up her aspiration of becoming a well known-writer. It sounded to me like all the rejection had gotten to her, and she was no longer willing to listen to any criticism. She would just write what she wanted from now on. In one sense, of course, that's exactly right. You have to be true to yourself when you write. But in another sense, it's fatal. You start writing things that only have meaning for one person in the world - yourself. Writing is both self-exploration and reaching out to others.
Michael - You systematically misunderstand me. I have nothing against the fact that you're
criticizing J on her writing, that's completely fine by me and I respect that. Getting critiqued is an important part of creativity, I don't deny that. (Even though it sometimes drags you down and makes you wonder why you do anything creative at all)
All I object to is that you constantly drag her looks into this, like it's relevant at all.
This is a personal blog that J occasionally posts short stories on.
For her friends and family, it's nice to see her face every now and then.
My own blog is pretty much the same, I post art I make every so often, but it mostly consists of personal stuff,
my reactions to "current events" and just random posts(including glamour-shots, even more hardcore than Js) .
The reason I post the art I make is beacuse it is a huge chunk of my life,
I spend a lot of time on it and for those interested it's interesting to see.
I don't show everything I make, however, and I don't feel obligated to. It's a personal blog. It's not my resumé (although it does generate jobs from time to time).
My art, although made in my spare time, has nothing to do with myself as a person except for the fact that I made it. Much like Js writing really has nothing to do with hers.
(Although, yes, we get inspired by events/experiences in our lives, how we dress and look is besides the point.)
If your only interest is in J a sa writer, then only read her short stories. Ignore the private stuff if her looks are getting in the way for you.
But the truth is, Js looks are putting a damper on peoples perception of her, and she doesn't deserve that. She's an intellectual that happens to be gorgeous.
I guess you haven't had much experience in that department, since you're male, but dealing with that at an early point in your life is tough, and ambigous, as I'm sure you can guess.
Post a Comment